Right in the centre - An inquiry please
- Details
- Published on Friday, March 25, 2022
By Ken Waddell
Neepawa Banner & Press
There have been numerous calls for the 水果视频 government to launch a review of how the COVID-19 pandemic was handled. The calls are well founded.
Over 1,700 people died in 水果视频, the majority of whom were care home residents and people with compromised health. The economy was severely hampered. Schools and students鈥� lives were disrupted. Social networking was placed in disarray or disappeared entirely for many people. Both the federal and provincial governments spent hundreds of millions of dollars to try and fend off the multiple effects of C-19. The huge flow of money was used to help businesses, individuals and, of course, to actually fight C-19.
As C-19 appears to be diminishing, it鈥檚 time to take a very serious look at what went wrong, what worked and, maybe most important, what efforts were of little value, or useless? Or, at worst, harmful.
The tragedy of the care homes showed us that care homes aren鈥檛 funded adequately and that there were some rules that didn鈥檛 make sense. In the early stages of C-19, for example, care home workers and visitors had to have their temperatures taken. That made sense. Then the clamp downs began and visitors were banned, even when the visitors were family members and volunteers that were essential to maintaining the well-being of residents. Countless care home residents died from loneliness, neglect that could have been addressed by volunteers and loved ones. Loved ones and volunteers were basically banned from care homes and hospitals. That meant that there often wasn鈥檛 someone to offer a glass of water or to help feed residents between meal times. Some care homes had fatality rates as high as one in three residents. With all those factors in mind, there should be a report on care homes, at least. If a report has been done on all care homes, it hasn鈥檛 been made public. The public needs to know, to be re-assured that the harsh lessons of C-19 won鈥檛 have to be re-learned over and over again.
An inquiry should be conducted, but not by a high-priced outside consultant. God knows, we have had enough of those over the years on various topics. The people who are actually at the front lines, the health care leaders are capable of contributing a report. In fact, they are obliged to do so. They are also, along with all the workers at all levels in the health care system, best equipped to know what鈥檚 going on. They were there at the front line and saw the devastation.
Let me illustrate with a story my father told me from WWII. In the summer of 1940, at age 32, he joined the Royal Winnipeg Rifles. He trained at Shilo and one day, he and his fellow soldiers were being instructed in trench warfare, a practise that saw extensive and deadly use in WWI. The instructor of the day was telling the troops that if an enemy plane flew by, that the soldiers should try to shoot it down. After the session was over, an older soldier, who had actually fought in the trenches in WWI, took the 鈥渂oys鈥� aside and told them to ignore the instructions. He said if an enemy plane came over and they fired at it, it would only reveal their position more clearly and the pilot could circle back and strafe the trenches, possibly killing or wounding many soldiers. He said to ignore the plane and report its position to headquarters so a plane might be sent out to hunt down the enemy fighter plane.
The advice makes sense and applies to our health care system. It鈥檚 the people who have been in the trenches who can best determine what went right and what went wrong. The public deserve to know and I am certain every health care worker would like to have their say. It鈥檚 the least we can do for health care to make sure that none of our elderly and compromised have died in vain. There鈥檚 1,700 reasons to have an inquiry.
On the economic side, we need an inquiry too. Did masks work or not? Did hand washing and social distancing work? Did business lockdowns work? Some may have, but small stores had to shut down and that made no sense. Most had, and still have, low volumes of customers. Large stores opened, but at half capacity. Why not small stores too? Some stores had to rope or curtain off certain 鈥渘on-essential鈥� items. That made no sense at all.
Whether the 水果视频 government has the sense to do an inquiry remains to be seen. They have done some really good things, but there were tons of errors too.
Now is the time for an inquiry before we face another pandemic as unprepared as we were for the last one.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column are the writer鈥檚 personal views and are not to be taken as being the view of the Banner & Press staff.
