Right in the centre - Beware of the elites
- Details
- Published on Friday, October 13, 2023
By Ken Waddell
Neepawa Banner & Press
After the Oct. 3 水果视频 election, there were some very happy people and some not so happy. In fact, a fair amount has been reported about how the Progressive Conservative Party, how it fared so badly and why.
To understand why the PCs lost the election and why there has been so much criticism of the PC leader, the party management and the campaign, one has to go back to at least 1983. In that era, the once very strong PC party lost to the NDP lead by Howard Pawley. The PC Party lead by Sterling Lyon had been defeated and a leadership race was set in place. In those days, the leadership was decided by a delegate convention and the candidate who got the most delegates from the 57 constituencies became the leader. Gary Filmon of Winnipeg won out over two rural candidates, Clayton Manness and Brian Ransom.
I can鈥檛 speak for earlier leadership races, but the party took a long time to solidify behind Filmon. Eventually it did and he ended up serving a long time as premier.
When Filmon resigned, the ever elusive party elite, gathered behind Stu Murray of Winnipeg and Murray was acclaimed. He never became premier. I was at the convention where Murray was voted out by the delegates and the wheels came off of what was left of the PC bus. The PC elite decided that a young, bright lawyer named Hugh McFadyen should be leader. He won by a lot of votes. He was opposed by Ron Schuler and (full disclosure here) by myself, Ken Waddell.
McFadyen lead the party in two elections, both losses, where he only got about 20 seats, nine short of a majority. He resigned on election night.
The party toyed around with a leadership race for about a year but the only candidate who came forward was Brian Pallister. The PC elite didn鈥檛 like it, but Pallister had a lot of grassroots support, had experience as both an MLA and MP and he was acclaimed. He won two elections and then resigned after being deemed as unapproachable and autocratic.
The PC elite decided that long time MLA and cabinet minisister, Heather Stefanson would make a good leader. Their plans were almost upended by former MP Shelly Glover, who only fell short by a few votes from upsetting the apple cart. Stefanson prevailed by a few votes and served as premier.
The PC Party鈥檚 problem is that the PC elite still rules the roost.
So, what鈥檚 the problem with that? The problem is that when the PC elite get their way, they almost always fail. The only leader that became premier in an election was Pallister and he certainly wasn鈥檛 wanted by the PC elite. They hated him really, because he was a strong leader. Too strong actually in the end.
The PC Party鈥檚 problem is that while they call themselves a grassroots party, they have let the grassroots shrivel and die. The PC elite make sure of that by assuring that the party process doesn鈥檛 thrive.
Here鈥檚 how it鈥檚 supposed to work. There are supposed to be 57 constituency boards of about 10 people, a mix of men, women and youth. There is supposed to be a president, vice president, secretary and treasurer.There are supposed to be regional chairs who sit on the provincial board. There is supposed to be a party president and executive. Many of those offices go unfilled. To say the local and provincial boards and HQ staffing have been weak to non-existent would be an understatement.
The PC party structure needs to be re-activated from the grassroots up. If the party structure had been stronger, maybe the the last three leadership races would have been more robust and maybe the party structure could have avoided some of the bone-headed mistakes, especially those of the most recent election.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this column are the writer鈥檚 personal views and are not to be taken as being the view of the Banner & Press staff.
